The new HULA HOOP SHA-BOOP plays a special limited four-week run opening Friday, August 6 at 7:30 pm at the Milwaukee Rep's Stackner Cabaret. Tickets at the Rep Ticket Office at 108 East Wells, by phone at 414-224-9490, or online at milwaukeerep.com. (Katie Siri and Brian Craft in Hula Hoop Sha-Boop.)
Showing posts with label musical theater. Show all posts
Showing posts with label musical theater. Show all posts
Sunday, August 1, 2010
if you want to smile for 90 minutes...
i first saw hula hoop sha-boop 20 years ago at the milwaukee repertory theatre's stackner cabaret. a new version of the 50s-60s jukebox musical opens this friday, august 6th in the same theatre, directed by your's truly. in a desperate act of shameless self-promotion, i'm including not only a photo i took, but information on how to get tickets. c'mon.

Monday, July 26, 2010
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
and the tony goes to...
“American Idiot,” directed by Michael Mayer and performed with galvanizing intensity by a terrific cast, detonates a fierce aesthetic charge in this ho-hum Broadway season. A pulsating portrait of wasted youth that invokes all the standard genre conventions — bring on the sex, drugs and rock ’n’ roll, please! — only to transcend them through the power of its music and the artistry of its execution, the show is as invigorating and ultimately as moving as anything I’ve seen on Broadway this season. Or maybe for a few seasons past.if the new york production comes anywhere near the ragged intensity and stunning theatricality of the original berkeley rep production (i haven't seen the ny version yet, but i believe it is largely unchanged) then we have a (tony) winner. hands down.
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
the first "sunday" in milwaukee
stephen sondheim and james lapine's "sunday in the park with george" has never been produced in milwaukee. until now. i was lucky enough to be asked to direct marquette university's production of the show, which opened last thursday. there are five more chances to see it - wednesday, april 21 thru sunday, april 25. get tickets here.
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
new york's theatrical myopia
on monday, next to normal – the broadway musical about a mother struggling with bipolar disorder and the effect that her illness has on her family – won the 2010 pulitzer prize for drama.
on tuesday, l.a. times theatre critic and chair of this year's pulitzer jury charles mcnulty wrote this:
on tuesday, l.a. times theatre critic and chair of this year's pulitzer jury charles mcnulty wrote this:
In an era in which important new dramatic works rarely get their start in New York, the board's geographical myopia, a vision of the American theater that starts in Times Square and ends just a short taxi ride away is especially disheartening. Does anyone really believe that "Next to Normal" would have been chosen had it been submitted when it was at Arena Stage in Washington, D.C.?
Friday, April 9, 2010
we are (the addams) family
not exactly the way you want your new york times review to begin.
Imagine, if you dare, the agonies of the talented people trapped inside the collapsing tomb called “The Addams Family.” Being in this genuinely ghastly musical ...must feel like going to a Halloween party in a strait-jacket or a suit of armor. Sure, you make a flashy (if obvious) first impression. But then you’re stuck in the darn thing for the rest of the night, and it’s really, really uncomfortable. Why, you can barely move, and a strangled voice inside you keeps gasping, “He-e-e-lp! Get me out of here!”here's christine baranski, peter macnicol, christina ricci, jimmy workman and mercedes mcnab in the best addams family musical number ever. and you won't see it on the broadway:
Friday, January 22, 2010
the future of broadway is gaga
the new york times' jason zinoman thinks broadway should go gaga:
Melding multimedia images with old-fashioned razzle-dazzle, Lady Gaga’s show (which runs through Sunday) manages to integrate theme, image and even some narrative seamlessly into one of the most engrossing dramatic spectacles in town. As a theater critic who has suffered through too many stale, pop-infused musicals, I suggest that Broadway would be smart to follow her lead.
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Friday, October 16, 2009
a preview: the sky is not falling
rod weber is an actor, a singer, and an independent filmmaker and videographer. he's also the only person we called when we decided to document the sky is not falling, the skylight opera benefit in new york. by some strange stroke of good luck, rod was free, and he agreed to do it. he showed up on monday, october 5th at st. luke's theatre with three cameras and a crew of one.
here is a preview of the dvd you have to look forward to. it's a pretty astounding array of talent. everyone there to support their friends, to support art, and to support the skylight. all captured beautifully by rod.
i wish you could have been there too. something tells me, thanks to rod, you sort of can be.
here is a preview of the dvd you have to look forward to. it's a pretty astounding array of talent. everyone there to support their friends, to support art, and to support the skylight. all captured beautifully by rod.
i wish you could have been there too. something tells me, thanks to rod, you sort of can be.
Monday, August 17, 2009
why i twitter #2: to learn my subtext
seriously, the next time i'm in a play, i hope i can learn what my character's subtext is by reading twitter, just like the actors in broadway's next to normal:
so, who's right?
well, the playwright, clearly. if shakespeare had twittered what hamlet is thinking during his downtime, i guess i'd probably buy it. but isn't that the white space, aren't those the gaps we're left to fill in on our own? aren't those moments best left to an audience's imagination? or an actor's?
do you want to be told what's going on at all times?
In early May, six weeks after opening, the production began what is by all accounts a Broadway first: over Twitter, the social networking site, an adapted version of the show began to be published in the form of short text messages, or tweets — just a line from a character at a time.you too can read exactly what alice ripley's diana, robert spencer's dan and the rest of the n2n gang are really thinking when they're offstage, as the twitter version of next to normal was written by the play's bookwriter brian yorkey and composer tom kitt:
In the performance, Mr. Yorkey said, “we didn’t know what Dan the father was thinking when (Alice Ripley as Diana) was on the floor making sandwiches. But this is what they would say if they were tweeting, so it’s telling the story of the show but telling it from a lot of different perspectives. It was the show — but a new multiangle way of thinking of it.”actually, i thought i knew exactly what dan the father was thinking at that moment and it honestly wasn't: “do all wives end up sprawled on the floor making sandwiches for no one?”
so, who's right?
well, the playwright, clearly. if shakespeare had twittered what hamlet is thinking during his downtime, i guess i'd probably buy it. but isn't that the white space, aren't those the gaps we're left to fill in on our own? aren't those moments best left to an audience's imagination? or an actor's?
do you want to be told what's going on at all times?
Friday, July 31, 2009
the secrets of tkts
Sunday, July 26, 2009
part 1: what does an artistic director do?
cammmarato: "lead the organization into the future."
i asked that question of a few, well...artistic directors. what does it mean to be you? other than the words "artistic director" either precede or follow your name in the playbill (which is pretty cool.) oh, and sometimes you get to wear a crown (even cooler.)
anne marie cammarato is in her fifth season as artistic director for the delaware theatre company. prior to that she spent four years as associate artistic director of madison repertory theatre. she also served as the associate director of theatre X and worked on the artistic staff of milwaukee repertory theater.
here's what she had to say:
i asked that question of a few, well...artistic directors. what does it mean to be you? other than the words "artistic director" either precede or follow your name in the playbill (which is pretty cool.) oh, and sometimes you get to wear a crown (even cooler.)
anne marie cammarato is in her fifth season as artistic director for the delaware theatre company. prior to that she spent four years as associate artistic director of madison repertory theatre. she also served as the associate director of theatre X and worked on the artistic staff of milwaukee repertory theater.
here's what she had to say:
The most general definition I can give for an artistic director is that they provide the vision for the company. The board and the community decide the mission...then they hire an artistic leader to provide a vision to reach that mission.
The managing director is there to manage and execute the artistic director's vision toward the mission. The two should work in tandem, as partners, to provide a healthy system of checks and balances (one oversees the art and education...if there is an education department, and the other oversees the business.) A really simplified explanation is that one raises and earns the money (the managing director) and the other one spends the money (the artistic director).
They both do this responsibly and together toward a shared mission with the board.
On a day to day level, the managing director should be busy overseeing the execution of development, marketing, front of house, finances and facility needs. The artistic director oversees the choice of programming, the hiring of artists to execute the programming, being the artistic public face and representing the organization to the community and theatre world at large, and (most importantly) creating art.
The vision of the artistic director must reflect the needs of the community (as expressed in the mission) but also has a personal signature or stamp to it. The programming should fulfill the mission but also the personal aesthetic of the artistic leader. Otherwise, it's a booking house. Or a building that has a stage in it. And that maybe puts on plays...but it's not a producing organization without someone at the top providing artistic vision.
The artistic leader is reading plays, meeting playwrights, evaluating the plays within the context of their theatre in their community. They have to have their finger on the pulse of what's happening around them in the world of creating art, in order to keep attracting new audiences.
They literally LEAD the organization into the future.
Friday, July 17, 2009
another playbill take on the skylight mess
playbill re-examines the continuing skylight debacle in a fairly straightforward, blow-by-blow news piece.
a quibble:
a quibble:
After public outcry about the June 14 firing, Theisen had been asked to be a free-lance director. Then the board changed its mind and invited Theisen back full-time.the response to the skylight restructuring has been far more than a "public outcry," and could, one might argue should be covered in a news piece like this.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
over easy please
over the summer, the milwaukee theatre community will hold a weekly breakfast to discuss art in the city, the first being this friday at 8:00 am in catalano square, just south of the broadway theatre center.
while no specific agenda has been planned, attendees are encouraged to talk about their favorite ray jivoff performance. or awards. or the skylight restructuring.
or that ray jivoff thing.
artsy schmartsy has the details.
while no specific agenda has been planned, attendees are encouraged to talk about their favorite ray jivoff performance. or awards. or the skylight restructuring.
or that ray jivoff thing.
artsy schmartsy has the details.
Monday, June 22, 2009
musical theatre 101
judy garland, for me, was the epitome of the singing actress.
this is a video i think every student of musical theatre needs to watch and learn from. i've been known to sequester my favorite young singers in a living room and force them to watch it. it's from the "born in a trunk" segment of garland's 1960's television show. the sound is very, very quiet, and it's important you hear every subtlety and nuance, so bust out the headphones if you got 'em.
the song is somehow fitting to what milwaukee's skylight theatre is going through of late. and monday, june 22 marks the 40th anniversary of judy's death. thanks brian, for reminding me.
this is a video i think every student of musical theatre needs to watch and learn from. i've been known to sequester my favorite young singers in a living room and force them to watch it. it's from the "born in a trunk" segment of garland's 1960's television show. the sound is very, very quiet, and it's important you hear every subtlety and nuance, so bust out the headphones if you got 'em.
the song is somehow fitting to what milwaukee's skylight theatre is going through of late. and monday, june 22 marks the 40th anniversary of judy's death. thanks brian, for reminding me.
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
wherever there's magic & make-believe...
...and money. michael reidel in today's new york post:
AFTER years of pretending to "honor excellence in the theater," Tony officials are finally coming clean about their true calling: making money for the backers of big musicals.but hey, we also get dolly parton, elton john, liza minnelli, and poison.
Tony officials announced this week that the awards for things such as lighting, sets and costumes -- all insignificant components of a Broadway show, as anyone who works in the theater can attest -- will not make the broadcast.
In their place musical numbers from touring productions of "Jersey Boys," "Mamma Mia!" and -- here's a good reason to switch channels -- "Legally Blonde"?
Thursday, May 14, 2009
three boys! boys for sale!
theater awards are silly. why you would want one is a mystery to me.
this, for example, is one of the most ridiculous, embarrassing things i've ever heard of. broadway's tony voters this year have a really difficult decision when it comes to their choice for best performance by a leading actor in a musical.
here are theseven five nominees:
it's an incredibly demanding role, and a grueling 8-show a week schedule, so triple casting it is understandable. however, the show is so moving and wonderful that the tony committee or the tony administration or nathan lane and hugh jackman in a backroom somewhere decided that all three boys should not only share a role, but share a tony nomination.
so in all fairnesss, that last slot, amended, should read:
this is insight into what a joke all of this awards crap is. and how political it is. not that i wouldn't like to have one sitting somewhere in my apartment, on the mantle, on an end table (although, we have lots of "stuff" already – blown-glass from okinawa, dog ashes in a box, people ashes in an urn – i'd have to move something to make room for it. and even then, i'm not sure i'd like it featured so prominently. shouldn't it be something that people at a dinner party sort of notice by accident? after forty-five minutes or so? "wait... what's that? you have a tony award?" ...oh yes, well. you know. more cheeseballs?)
i'd be willing to bet that nine out of ten tony voters couldn't name all three actors playing billy elliot. and now, the tony administration (or whomever) has decided, hey! it doesn't really matter! in fact, you don't even need to see the actor perform to cast a vote for him.
a recently uncoveredtorture memo tony awards memo (not that different, when all is said and done) states, according to the new york times:
on a back bookshelf in the office, maybe?
(a sidenote: dear milwaukee theater community – [who for ten minutes considered giving themselves awards] – you wanna get together for a big party every year? throw a friggin' barbecue in the pickering's backyard, don't give some silly actress "a milwaukee theater award" because she needs another line for her bio. that'd be as silly as, well, nominating a character for best actor.)
here are the
- gavin creel in the revival of hair,
- the not-terribly-funny but big and loud brian d’arcy james in the big and loud and almost not as funny shrek the musical,
- brooding douchebag constantine maroulis in rock of ages;
- j. robert "i'm cleaning up my wife's blood with a sponge and a bucket" spencer in next to normal;
- or the character of billy elliot in billy elliot: the musical.
it's an incredibly demanding role, and a grueling 8-show a week schedule, so triple casting it is understandable. however, the show is so moving and wonderful that the tony committee or the tony administration or nathan lane and hugh jackman in a backroom somewhere decided that all three boys should not only share a role, but share a tony nomination.
so in all fairnesss, that last slot, amended, should read:
- david alvarez, trent kowalik and kiril kulish in billy elliot: the musical.
this is insight into what a joke all of this awards crap is. and how political it is. not that i wouldn't like to have one sitting somewhere in my apartment, on the mantle, on an end table (although, we have lots of "stuff" already – blown-glass from okinawa, dog ashes in a box, people ashes in an urn – i'd have to move something to make room for it. and even then, i'm not sure i'd like it featured so prominently. shouldn't it be something that people at a dinner party sort of notice by accident? after forty-five minutes or so? "wait... what's that? you have a tony award?" ...oh yes, well. you know. more cheeseballs?)
i'd be willing to bet that nine out of ten tony voters couldn't name all three actors playing billy elliot. and now, the tony administration (or whomever) has decided, hey! it doesn't really matter! in fact, you don't even need to see the actor perform to cast a vote for him.
a recently uncovered
Tony award voters have to see only one of the three boys rotating in the title role of “Billy Elliot: The Musical” before voting on their joint nomination for leading actor in a musical.i.e. you're not voting for an actor or a performance, you're voting for a role. shouldn't the writer then get this acting award? this is the nature of theater awards. silly. political. crap.
on a back bookshelf in the office, maybe?
(a sidenote: dear milwaukee theater community – [who for ten minutes considered giving themselves awards] – you wanna get together for a big party every year? throw a friggin' barbecue in the pickering's backyard, don't give some silly actress "a milwaukee theater award" because she needs another line for her bio. that'd be as silly as, well, nominating a character for best actor.)
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Saturday, April 25, 2009
it would have been wonderful
"If I had to live my life over again, I would have children.stephen sondheim talks about the prospect of never writing another musical, the only lyricist he wants to work with, and katharine hepburn banging on his door at 3:00 in the morning, in a rare interview with the times of london.
That’s the great mistake I made.
It’s too late now. The idea of being a homosexual and raising children was one that was just not acceptable until, my goodness, I’d say the 1970s or 1980s. You want to live long enough to see your children grow up, they’re not puppies. The joy is not just to have them, but to watch them change and grow.
So, yes, that is a great regret.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)